Difference between revisions of "Ldl notes"
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Historically, IBM P/Series hardware is a proven solid option. | Historically, IBM P/Series hardware is a proven solid option. | ||
As of 2013, P/Series is still a good option. | As of 2013, P/Series is still a good option. | ||
| + | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
That said, the modern IBM X/Series equipment has many of the advanced | That said, the modern IBM X/Series equipment has many of the advanced | ||
features that until recently required either P/Series or Z/Series | features that until recently required either P/Series or Z/Series | ||
machines. | machines. | ||
| + | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
There are some key considerations that need addressing if you plan | There are some key considerations that need addressing if you plan | ||
Revision as of 00:02, 20 April 2013
Contents
ldl's items in development
Fidelity GT.M
InterSystems Cache
Hardware
This was written by me (Gus). It reflects my bias toward using IBM hardware. That is not to say that other vendors do not have good options. My bias is shown what it is, and feel free to interpolate the following comments as being essentially the same for non-IBM gear.
IBM P/Series (PowerPC)
Historically, IBM P/Series hardware is a proven solid option. As of 2013, P/Series is still a good option.
That said, the modern IBM X/Series equipment has many of the advanced
features that until recently required either P/Series or Z/Series
machines.
There are some key considerations that need addressing if you plan
to use P/Series equipment for your deployment:
- GT.M is not AGPL3 for AIX
- AIX is a licensed (costs money)
IBM X/Series (Intel/AMD x86/x86_64)
Other Options
There may be other options worth considering, but as of Apr 2013, most of those options are either relics of the past looking for current employment (e.g. IBM A/Series or Z/Series or things like Itanium, etc).
As future technology is revealed, then we can reconsider those options.
Operating System
CentOS
RHEL
Ubuntu
AIX
<a tag="GTMGPL">GTMGPL</a>
